Evidence and judgement
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
? Deliberation , Judgement and the Nature of Evidence ?
One kind of deliberation involves an individual reassessing the strengths of her beliefs in the light of new evidence. Bayesian epistemology measures the strength to which one ought to believe a proposition by its probability relative to all available evidence, and thus provides a normative account of individual deliberation. This can be extended to an account of individual judgement by treatin...
متن کاملDeliberation, Judgement and the Nature of Evidence §1 Deliberation and Judgement
One kind of deliberation involves an individual reassessing the strengths of her beliefs in the light of new evidence. Bayesian epistemology measures the strength to which one ought to believe a proposition by its probability relative to all available evidence, and thus provides a normative account of individual deliberation. This can be extended to an account of individual judgement by treatin...
متن کاملConsidered judgement in evidence-based guideline development.
BACKGROUND Clinical practice guidelines should be based on the best available evidence. However, this evidence is often incomplete, controversial, or lacking. Other considerations beyond the evidence are therefore needed to be able to formulate specific and applicable recommendations for clinical practice. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to obtain consensus among experts about a set of dom...
متن کاملAesthetic Judgement and Political Judgement
a bstr act Prominent positions in the contemporary theoretical field of the humanities tend to conceptualize late modern communities in general as aes thetic communities of taste. In regard to political communities, this means reducing the political to an implication of the aesthetic discourse. This article argues for addressing the aesthetic and the political as distinct discourses that are, ...
متن کاملFurther evidence against independence preservation in expert judgement synthesis
When a decision maker chooses to form his/her own probability distribution by combining the opinions of a number of experts, it is sometimes recommended that he/she should do so in such a way as to preserve any form of expert agreement regarding the independence of the events of interest. In this paper, we argue against this recommendation. We show that for those probability spaces which contai...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: British Journal of General Practice
سال: 2016
ISSN: 0960-1643,1478-5242
DOI: 10.3399/bjgp16x683737